“Laurel: I’m incapable of small talk.”

March 29, 2007

More crap on hidden Imam

Filed under: Political Science, stats — aletheia22 @ 11:02 am

While the Zionist plan targets Jerusalem, which is holy to us, the Safavid plan targets Mecca and Al-Madina. If you go back to their books – which they do not mention in the media, yet these books exist and are accepted by them – they claim that their Hidden Imam will come to Mecca and Al-Madina, destroy the Al-Haram Mosque and the Mosque of the Prophet, and dig in the graves of Abu Bakr and Omar and burn them both, and then he will command the wind to blow them away. He will also dig in the grave of Aisha, the Mother of the Believers, and will execute her. All this is part of their plan.”

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=iran&ID=SP146507

 There is no Sunni mosque in Tehran, even though there are over two million Sunni Muslims there.”

Now that Iran bastards are in spotlight again….focus is on : Coming of the 12th Imam.

Filed under: Global Macro (Noon meal), Philosophy, Political Science — aletheia22 @ 10:51 am

http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD143607

January 25, 2007 No.1436

Waiting for the Mahdi: Official Iranian Eschatology Outlined in Public Broadcasting Program in Iran

The website of the governmental Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) has posted a lengthy document titled “The World toward Illumination.” The document is a transcript of an IRIB series on the imminent arrival of the Mahdi, the Twelfth or Hidden Imam, awaited by Shi’ites as the Messiah

  is a manifestation of God’s glory and beauty. Imam Mahdi is the perfect human being. His behavior is praiseworthy and his manners immaculate. He is the embodiment of justice. His torch of guidance is for all mankind…

“In short, when he reappears, peace, justice and security will overcome oppression and deceit and one global government, the most perfect ever, will be established. He will make the earth prosper in a way in which no ruins will remain. Man’s maturity will reach its height, full equality will be established among the people, and no one will be arrogant toward the other and will not try to dominate others.

March 13, 2007

What a person in the know should know, as defined by Harvard…looking conservative to me

Filed under: Political Science, Surprises — aletheia22 @ 6:59 pm

What we’re saying is that an educated person should have a certain set of capacities: inter-pretive capacities, problem-solving capacities, reflective capacities and critical capacities to help them through the world,” she said.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

required to take one course in each of eight categories. These include: science of living systems; science of the physical universe; societies of the world, which would cover ethnic identity, statehood and government; empirical reasoning, which would include courses on evaluating data; and ethical reasoning, which would cover philosophy, political theory and religion.

The three other areas are: aesthetic and interpretive understanding, which focuses on cultural expression, such as literature, art and music

February 12, 2007

new buzzword : “participative democracy”

Filed under: Political Science, Politics — aletheia22 @ 11:19 am

Ségolène Royal unveils far-left economic campaign platform

Sunday, February 11, 2007 in World Herald Tribune

ILLEPINTE, FranceSégolène Royal, the presidential candidate of the Socialist Party, unveiled a long- awaited platform on Sunday, veering sharply to the left on economic policy while also stressing discipline and “traditional values.” Ten weeks before the election, Royal is hoping to reverse a slide in popularity that has seen her lose ground to her main challenger, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy.In a two-hour speech to about 10,000 supporters north of Paris, she laid out a 100-proposal platform, pledging to raise pensions, to increase the minimum wage to €1,500, or about $2,000, a month and to guarantee a job or further training for every youth within six months of graduating from university.

She also said that randomly selected citizens’ juries would watch over government policy and that juvenile delinquents could be placed in educational camps run by the military.

As if to preempt her opponents on the right, she stressed throughout her speech that her ideas had been nourished in 6,000 debates with citizens throughout France, a method she has called “participative democracy.”

“With me, politics will never again happen without you,” a combative Royal, 53, told the crowd of flag-waving supporters wearing her logo on T-shirts and stickers. “Today I offer you a presidential pact: 100 proposals for France to rediscover a shared ambition, pride and fraternity.”

Sunday marked the end of the two- month “listening phase” Royal decreed after her nomination in November. On her campaign Web site, a sky blue background was replaced by the blue, white and red of the national flag, and regional campaign teams were equipped with booklets summarizing her program.

In a sign that her recent decline in opinion polls has rallied some of the more skeptical members of her party, Royal’s speech was attended by all senior Socialists, including her two rivals for the nomination.

Cheered by supporters and frequently interrupted by applause, she spoke with more ease than usual. When she talked about France’s volatile suburbs, where riots erupted in November 2005 and high unemployment rates continue to curb the opportunities of second-generation immigrants, the emotion was evident on her face and in her voice.

“I want for the children in these suburbs what I want for my own children,” she said, clenching a fist before her bright-red blazer and prompting the crowd to erupt into a two-minute standing ovation.

A former schools minister, she vowed that she would tackle the social exclusion in the suburbs by reducing the number of students in classes. She also promised free tutoring for students that have difficulties keeping up, and workshops for parents to teach them how to discipline their children.

A substantial part of her speech was dedicated to social and economic issues, on which Royal took a hard-left line.

“The unfettered rein of financial profit is intolerable for the general interest,” she said. “You told me simple truths. You told me you wanted fewer income inequalities. You told me you wanted to tax capital more than labor. We will do that reform.”

Royal said she would tax companies in relation to what share of their profits is reinvested in equipment and jobs, and what portion is paid to shareholders. She also promised to abolish a flexible work contract for small companies and hold a national conference in June on how to increase salaries.

Indeed, she seemed to have something to offer to most groups in society without saying how much the combined measures would cost: Under her presidency, she said, young women would get free contraception, all young people would get access to a €10,000 interest- free loan and the handicapped would see their benefits rise.

Royal also spoke about foreign policy, an area where she has recently been accused of incompetence, following a series of highly publicized gaffes. She called for a European Union that “protects its citizens” and said that, as president, she would lobby for the European Central Bank to consider not just inflation but also employment and growth when it sets interest rates.

“I don’t want a Europe that is just a free-trade area attached to NATO,” Royal said. “Even less do I want a Europe where it’s everyone against everyone and social and fiscal dumping replaces solidarity.”

She also said she would pursue a “solid partnership” with the United States, but accused Washington of sometimes being carried away by its size and power. “Size has nothing to do with principles,” she said. Being less powerful “is never a reason to be silent, we saw that with Iraq, where the voice of France was not heard.”

She said she would break with “corrupt regimes” and be blunt with allied countries, including Russia, whose “war crimes in Chechnya” she condemned.

Her speech, which touched on everything from the environment to education policy, comes after weeks of criticism from the center-right, which assailed Royal for lacking ideas and a clear program.

Ahead in the polls until late last year, Royal has slipped behind Sarkozy since he was officially nominated on Jan. 14. The latest BVA poll, conducted last week, gave the interior minister a four- point lead over Royal in a straight run- off and suggested that François Bayrou, a centrist candidate, was gaining ground at her expense.

Even members of her own camp had grown impatient in recent weeks, eagerly awaiting her program. But on Sunday, supporters in the Villepinte convention center expressed hope that her performance would be enough to kick start her campaign.

“She was good, much better than usual,” said Marie-Pierre Grassineau, a 45- year-old social worker, who said she had feared Royal would disappoint in the face of inflated expectations. “At last the campaign can begin.”

In an apparent attempt to steal the limelight, Sarkozy chose Sunday to give a speech to 3,000 supporters in central Paris, vowing that if elected he would open his government to politicians outside his center-right party.

His Union for a Popular Movement party swiftly denounced Royal’s list of proposals as “archaic” and a return to old-school socialism.

Reminiscent of the 110 proposals that carried her mentor, François Mitterrand, to the Élysée Palace in 1981, Royal’s presidential platform will be filled out with more details in a series of high- profile campaign meetings over coming weeks.

February 3, 2007

“The voice of destruction” by Hermann Rauschning

Filed under: Political Science, books — aletheia22 @ 8:28 pm

is excellent book im reading

the conversations with Hitler from 1932-1932 (  book was published in 1940) by high ranking NASDAP member,  who severed his ties shortly afterwards.  Im struggling to decide how much weight to give to exactness of Hitlers numerous quotations, but given, that it was published in 1940(!)  the exactness is not the point. its the spirit that is.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Rauschning

“The Frog” does 180 jump

Filed under: Political Science — aletheia22 @ 11:33 am

I would say that what is dangerous about this situation is not the fact of having a nuclear bomb – having one, maybe a second one a little later, well that’s not very dangerous,” he said on Monday, seeming to contradict France’s official position of opposing Iran’s nuclear enrichment activities.”The danger does not lie in the bomb it [Iran] will have, and which will be of no use to it. Where will it drop it this bomb? On Israel? It would not have gone 200m into the atmosphere before Tehran would be razed to the ground,” said Mr Chirac, who is expected to step down in May’s election.

The French president was later forced to hastily organise an embarrassing second interview to retract his earlier statements, including his warning about Tehran being “razed to the ground”, which he said was “a manner of speaking in my mind” that he assumed was “off-the-record”.

The Elysée Palace issued a statement yesterday reaffirming France’s position on Iran. “France, with the international community, cannot accept the prospect of Iran with a nuclear weapon . . . The Iranian nuclear programme is opaque and so dangerous for the region as far as proliferation and the arms race are concerned.”

  

Published in FT, By Martin Arnold in Paris

Published: February 2 2007 02:00 | Last updated: February 2 2007 02:00

January 30, 2007

Selected quotes on bureaucracy

Filed under: Political Science, human nature — aletheia22 @ 12:02 pm

The bureaucrat is not free to aim at improvement. He is bound to obey rules and regulations established by a superior body. He has no right to embark upon innovations if his superiors do not approve of them. His duty and his virtue is to be obedient. Ludwig von Mises , Bureaucracy p. 66 Bureaucracy 

No private enterprise will ever fall prey to bureaucratic methods of management if it is operated with the sole aim of making profit. Bureaucracy p. 64 

“In any bureaucracy, paper work increases as you spend more and more time reporting on the less and less you are doing” 

Bureaucracy is a giant mechanism operated by pygmies.”Honore de Balzac  

“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.”Thomas Sowell 

“If there is a way to delay in important decision, the good bureaucracy, public or private, will find it. 

Bureaucracy, the rule of no one, has become the modern form of despotism.
Mary McCarthy  

Blog at WordPress.com.